Source: http://news.feedzilla.com/en_us/stories/politics/top-stories/257417378?client_source=feed&format=rss
courtney robertson ben flajnik randy moss randy moss hunger games premiere the bachelor good morning america
Monday, October 22, 2012
Company's survey succeeded because of employee trust ...
After a major merger, Sims Metal Management in Princeton, N.J., polled employees to learn how engaged they were in their work, and got an overwhelming response.
More than 90% of employees of the world?s largest metal and recycling company responded to the organization?s first-ever employee engagement survey. Execs attribute the impressive showing to these factors:
- The CEO made it clear the survey had his backing.
- The company assured employees that responses would be confidential, and that they would see the survey results?good and bad.
- Management pledged to use the results to make appropriate changes.
The survey found overall employee engagement was 77%, which Sims says is higher than the manufacturing-industry average.
Contact: Thomas Sansone, group chief HR officer, at (212) 604-0710.
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.
The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/32585/companys-survey-succeeded-because-of-employee-trust "
Source: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/32585/companys-survey-succeeded-because-of-employee-trust
a.j. jenkins riley reiff david decastro aj jenkins shea mcclellin nfl draft 2012 whitney mercilus
US and Iran: Could Romney be tougher than Obama? Unlikely.
Short of conducting a unilateral military strike or declaring war against the Islamic Republic, a Romney administration would be faced with the same legislative options on Iran as President Obama, who has already administered them. ? ? ?
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad speaks at a press conference in Tehran, Iran, Oct. 2. Ahmadinejad blames the steep drop in Iran's currency to "psychological pressures" linked to Western sanctions over Tehran's nuclear program.
Vahid Salemi/AP
EnlargeIn the run-up to Monday?s debate between Barack Obama and Mitt Romney, the most disputed foreign policy issue hasn?t been Afghanistan, where roughly 68,000 US troops are still based in the fight against Al Qaeda, or the?contentious decision by the Obama administration to withdraw US troops from Iraq. ?
Skip to next paragraph' +
google_ads[0].line2 + '
' +
google_ads[0].line3 + '
Subscribe Today to the Monitor
As moderator Martha Raddatz said at the Oct. 11 vice-presidential debate, the biggest national security threat faced by the United States is now considered to be the Islamic Republic of Iran.?
?Every American is less secure today because [President Obama] has failed to slow Iran?s nuclear threat,? Mitt Romney said at the Republican National Convention in August. The Republican candidate has since argued that Mr. Obama hasn?t been tough enough on Tehran, and he has vowed to institute a different, harsher sanctions program that will be sure to cripple the Islamic Republic.? ??
But analysts, legal experts, and US-allied diplomats say that when it comes to sanctions on Iran, US legislation isn't expected to differ much from one administration to another.?Short of conducting a unilateral military strike or declaring war against the Islamic Republic, a Romney administration would be faced with the same legislative options on Iran as President Obama, who has already administered them.??? ??
Obama vs. Romney 101: 3 ways they differ on Iran
Former President George W. Bush began implementing legislation for harsher financial sanctions against Iran during his last two years in office. After the 2008 presidential election, the Obama administration instituted and expanded those sanctions at a speed that has made current US sanctions policy on Iran the harshest in contemporary history.?This leaves a potential new Romney administration with few policy alternatives.
?The only thing Romney can really do to get to the right of Obama on Iran policy is to say he'd bomb Iran if elected president, or would actively promote and pursue a policy of regime change,? says Karim Sajadpour, a senior associate at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.??Given the misgivings Americans have about the Iraq war, I don't think those are winning talking points for him.?
Since Obama became president in 2009, his administration has used a carrot-and-stick approach with the Islamic Republic, practicing a policy of?limited engagement while boosting the implementation of Bush-era financial sanctions against Tehran and enacting new, tighter financial restrictions.?
Iran?s economy began feeling the bite of new US and United Nations sanctions during the last two years of former President Bush?s second term in office.?When Obama became president, the US Treasury Department upped the ante on Iran sanctions, accelerating their implementation and obtaining concrete commitments from US allies and private international entities to institute them as well.
Obama?s administration has also been tougher on US allies, particularly in Europe, flanking traditional diplomacy with direct pressure for collaboration on Iran policy, according to interviews with western European diplomats. ?
heather morris ncaa bracket predictions jeff foxworthy the bachelor finale march madness bracket south by southwest i want to know what love is
Sunday, October 21, 2012
Israel swaps missile drills for earthquake rehearsal
JERUSALEM (Reuters) - Israel dropped its annual simulation of a missile attack and held its first major earthquake drill on Sunday instead, but officials insisted the country remained as ready as ever for the possibility of a war with arch-foe Iran.
School children, civil servants and others participating in the "Turning Point 6" exercise were urged to flee outdoors if possible as radio and TV channels broadcast tremor alerts. In previous years, people were told to go to household bomb shelters in order to flee an imaginary missile attack.
"We want people to run into homes during a missile attack, and we want people to run out of homes during an earthquake," Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said after he and fellow ministers evacuated their weekly cabinet meeting.
The change in format comes at a time when hostile rhetoric over Tehran's disputed nuclear program has waned, with both Israel and the United States about to hold elections and Western powers pursuing ever-stronger sanctions against Iran.
But Israeli officials denied the drill signaled an easing of their stance on Iran.
Defence Minister Ehud Barak said the exercise readied Israel for more than "something that happens once in 5,000 years", but for what he called "the very real scenarios" of missile strikes.
Other officials emphasized the risk of an earthquake given the abutting Syria-Africa rift along Israel's eastern frontier.
"We understand that earthquakes will certainly happen. The question is when," Mickey Tessler, a brigadier-general in Israel's military Homefront Command, told Army Radio.
"It is very important to emphasize that whoever is ready for earthquakes perforce increases his readiness level for various events, including wartime events," he said.
Tessler said people should respond "in seconds" due to Israel's lack of seismic early warning systems but another official said work on technologies that could eventually detect tremors up to half a minute in advance was underway.
"NO LINK TO MILITARY MANOEUVRES"
Turning Point 6 was to feature simulations of 5.4- and 7.1- scale tremors as well as a tsunami drenching the coast, where most of Israel's population and industry is centered.
Israelis on the lower floors of buildings were instructed to find safe ground outside, and those on higher storeys to shelter in fortified rooms, with doors kept open, or under sturdy furniture.
Officials said that Israel had once adhered to a policy followed in other earthquake-prone countries for people to take cover indoors rather than venture outside.
"However, upon review, we found because buildings in Israel tend to be made of heavier materials such as bricks, it would be better to advise those who can to go outdoors," Alon Rozen, an ex-director general of the civil defence ministry, said.
The drill coincided with Israeli-hosted joint missile-defence maneuvers with U.S. forces. That three-week drill, "Austere Challenge 2012", is unrelated to Turning Point 6, an Israeli military spokeswoman said.
Israel has hinted it could resort to military force to deny Iran the means to make nuclear arms - which Tehran denies seeking - and has made similar threats to attack Syria's chemical arsenal. Either action could draw retaliatory missiles against the Jewish state from Iran, Syria and Islamist militants in Lebanon and Gaza.
(Writing by Allyn Fisher-Ilan and Dan Williams; Editing by Jeffrey Heller and Andrew Osborn)
Source: http://news.yahoo.com/israel-swaps-missile-drills-earthquake-rehearsal-193032531.html
indy 500 angelina jolie leg daytona jeff gordon artie lange nascar daytona 2012 kasey kahne
why cyberwarfare won't have a battle of thermopylae | weird things
While reporting about cyberwarfare and information security has been getting better and better as of late, there are still some articles that posit baffling ideas about how to prevent a massive cyber attack launched by a government. The strange idea in question this time is one which has a good starting point, but ends up imagining cyber attacks as one would imagine a conventional siege, somewhat reminiscent of The Battle of Thermopylae. Rather than envisioning an attack from the cloud able to hit a target out of the blue, it tries to portray network topologies as a kind of unseen battlefield on which one side can gain an advantage by exploiting the landscape?
Cyberspace depends on a physical infrastructure of computers and fiber, and this physical infrastructure is located on national territory or subject to national jurisdiction. Cyberspace is a hierarchy of networks, at the top of which a small number of companies carry the bulk of global traffic over the Internet ?backbone.? International traffic, including attacks, enters the United States over this ?backbone.? The backbone is a choke point, relatively easy to defend, and something that the NSA is already intimately familiar with (as are the other major powers that engage in signals intelligence). Sit at the boundary of the backbone and U.S. jurisdiction, monitor and intercept malware, and attacks can be blocked.
Technically yes, you can use the main switches where the fiber stretching across the oceans will reach your shores and have a deep packet inspector check the headers of incoming packets to flag anything suspicious. But this really only works for relatively straightforward attacks and can easily be avoided. If you?re trying to inject a worm or a virus into a research lab?s computer, you?ll have to get through an anti-virus system which will scan your malware and compare its bytes to as many virus and worm signatures in its database as it reasonably can. With the sheer amount of malware out there today, these tools are good at stopping existing infections and their mutant versions. However, brand new attacks require reverse engineering and being ran in a simulated environment to be identified. This is how Flame and Gauss went undetected for years and they were most likely not even spread via the web, but with infected flash drives, meaning that efforts to stop them with packet inspection would?ve been absolutely useless.
A deep packet inspector sitting at MAE-East or MAE-West exchange points (or IXPs) would have to work like an anti-virus suite if it is to do what the author is proposing, so it can stop someone from downloading an obvious virus or bit of spyware from a server in another nation or deny an odd stream of packets from China or Iran thought to be malicious, but it?s not a choke point in any conventional sense. IXPs are not in the business of being a traffic cop so having them take on that role could have serious diplomatic repercussions, and aggressive filtering could have all sorts of nasty downstream effects on the ISPs connected to them. Considering that trying to flag traffic by country could be foiled by proxies and IP spoofing, and that complex new attacks would easily be able to slip by an IXP-based anti-virus system, all the effort may might be worth it in the long run and simply cause glitches for users trying to watch Netflix or surfing foreign websites to read the news in another language while trying to prevent threats users can easily manage.
So if creating IXP chokepoints would do little to stop the kind of complex attacks for which they?d be needed, why has there been so much talk about the Pentagon treating the internet as a top national security concern and trying to secure networks across America, or at the very least, be on call should anything go wrong? Why is the Secretary of Defense telling businesspeople that he views cybersecurity as the country?s biggest new challenge and has the Air Force on the job? My guess would be that some organizations and businesses simply haven?t been investing the time and attention they needed to be investing in security and now see the DOD as the perfect, cost-effective way to secure their networks, even though they could thwart attacks and counter-hack on their own without getting the military on the case, perhaps not even realizing that they?re giving it a Sisyphean task. If they know they?re targets, the best thing for them to do is to secure their networks and be aggressive about hiring infosec experts, not call in the cavalry and expect it to stop a real threat from materializing since it simply can?t perform such miracles?
Source: http://worldofweirdthings.com/2012/10/20/why-cyberwarfare-wont-have-a-battle-of-thermopylae/
joe walsh the civil wars paul mccartney duggar miscarriage roman holiday belize adele lyrics
BIG#$@ Army vs Eastern Michigan live online ncaa college Football ...
Source: http://www.scam.com/showthread.php?t=187955
wnba draft tax day april 17 boston marathon tu pac hologram shuttle pippa middleton
Low-priced Website Hosting Companies - Free Online Articles ...
Your new site is prepared to add, and now you will need a website host. Or maybe you have already got an online host, but uptime and assistance are missing. Of one?s countless word wide web hosts to select from, how can you come across one which you possibly can rely on? Know very well what can go mistaken and what to observe out for, and analysis potential web site hosts rigorously.
What can go incorrect with online internet hosting
An excessive amount of downtime
Trouble occur, and in many cases if they will not, server upkeep outcomes inside of a minimum level of downtime. A trusted internet host not simply maintains servers perfectly, and also displays the servers and fixes obstacles right away. Considering the style of web site host you would like to eliminate, still, your web site may possibly be down for times.
Abilities that do not give good results
Whenever your e mail will not do the job, your small business shuts down. Difficulties with databases as well as other characteristics may decelerate or give up your online business. Most world wide web hosts have an understanding of this, but some never destination a higher precedence on preserving not just your website web-based but anything functioning likewise.
Lousy assistance
Trustworthy net hosts respond to tech assist basic questions within just hrs. Other internet hosts, then again, happen to be identified to consider times. And when people responses arrive, every now and then they are canned responses that do not tackle the difficulty.
Lousy conversation
Aid persons with nice conversation knowledge benefit hold troubles from evolving into more substantial concerns. Simply being instructed, ?Everything appears excellent below, and so the complication is solved,? brings about annoyance. So is possessing your internet site shut down as it utilized also plenty of methods alternatively as opposed to online host getting in touch with you regarding the dilemma for starters.
Billing situations
Even when you cancel your account, obstacles could very well continue on. Some less-than-dependable word wide web hosts you shouldn?t honor their refund coverage. Most people never halt computerized billing following the account is cancelled.
What to look at out for
At the time you see the next at world-wide-web host sites, look into them crimson flags to alert you of viable conditions.
Unsustainable pricing
If ever the pricing seems as well solid being accurate, it definitely is. Could it be plenty of to pay for for server preservation and tech assistance? You receive whatever you shell out for.
Limitless bandwidth
Nothing at all is de facto endless. When you join an account supplying endless bandwidth then utilize a ton of bandwidth, hope to own the plug pulled on your own information site. The net host may likely find out an alternate rationalization for discontinuing your account, but ?unlimited? sometimes usually means ?as lengthy when you never make use of a large amount.?
An unprofessional-looking blog
Think about what amount effort and hard work the world wide web host place into furnishing an usable web pages with helpful subject material. Does it provide you with self-assurance during the internet host, or could it be filled with unsubstantiated statements and grammar and spelling faults? An online host does not would need to generally be a spelling qualified, obviously. However, if the organization has not place a great deal energy into telling you regarding their products, will they be conscientious about assembly clients? requires?
Methods to homework word wide web hosts
Selecting net hosts is a snap sufficient. Research engines will take you with the website pages of a huge number of internet hosts. But following you have narrowed down your checklist by abilities and price level, how will you identify out which word wide web hosts are trustworthy?
Browse through internet host package deal data and TOS
In case the internet hosting offers present enormous quantities of disk room and bandwidth for pretty affordable charges, think of your self warned. Do not hope the organization to possess plenty of wealth for upkeep and guidance.
If you would like to generally be totally sure you can obtain a refund if you would like a particular, check out exactly what the Terms and conditions of Services (TOS) claims about refunds.
Look over the internet host discussion board
What?s the atmosphere with the discussion board? Are clients? doubts answered satisfactorily? Do not be troubled if you happen to see dilemmas; rather, be troubled if you decide to you shouldn?t see any conditions. Some net hosts take away posts that do not demonstrate their service inside a good mild. If posts about trouble keep on being on the discussion board, you possibly can observe how the host handles challenges.
Go through world-wide-web host critiques
Shopper opinions in the world wide web host?s resource site may perhaps or could possibly not be legitimate. Its attainable for hosts for making up suggestions, and several have even copied comments from other webpages. Find comments with hyperlinks on the clients? websites, and examine by means of to view in case the distinct world-wide-web host literally hosts that website.
A variety of boards make it easy for people young and old to article net host ratings. In case you check out recommendations, give some thought to the poster?s credibility. Many people bash their hosts because they are sad about things. If ever the host posts in reaction to the concern, observe how the host attempts to take care of it.
Look at the corporate track record
The ?About Us? or ?Company Background? site on the internet host?s web-site will need to remedy these problems.
The length of time has the organization been in company? A whole new firm possibly will be awesome, but it is really proper to remember that considerably of companies fall short in the earliest yr.
Does the business publish a privateness plan? Does this coverage evidently shield clients? privateness?
In which will be the servers found? Preferably, they need to be in a very datacenter, instead of in someone?s basement.
Exactly what are the server uptime figures? Should the word wide web host does not publish an url to some server uptime watch, request an url to 1. Uptime of about ninety nine.seven p.c or greater is usually thought of as brilliant.
Does the business publish an tackle? You could practically never ought it, but if you?re inserting your business online site in a second business?s fingers, you must are aware that the corporate is reliable and obtainable.
E mail pre-sales concerns
Solutions in your pre-sales queries inform you so much concerning the web site host. You are likely to see how speedily the business responds and exactly how perfectly they converse. Check with concerns about any with the earlier mentioned factors at the same time as concerns unique towards your requirements.
~~~~~
Getting a trusted world-wide-web host requires time, but addressing challenges and relocating your website normally takes alot more time. Some time used hunting for a reliable world wide web host can be described as worthwhile financial investment.
The following can be an idea: When you are free explore to Common Internet Hosting Phrases Outlined And Defined to get more facts around the respective matter. I?m definitely sure you are going to discover the data to get genuinely informative.
Related posts:
- Get Low-cost And Low-priced Website Hosting
- Low Priced Website Hosting Companies ? The Simplest Way To Start Out Up Your Website
- Low Priced Website Hosting Companies ? The Simplest Way To Start Out Up Your Website
- Low Priced Internet Hosting Companies ? The Simplest Way To Start Out Up Your Website
- Affordable Website Hosting Companies ? The Easiest Way To Commence Up Your Internet
Source: http://www.28seo.com/low-priced-website-hosting-companies-the-best-way-to-commence-up-your-net.html
nascar news doppler radar colorado rockies moonshine news channel 4 radar weather weather channel
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)